Quick database related question for Doug Hurst regarding his Burke Lake Par 3 courses:
the beta (crz #2227) from 2015 is listed as version 2003T (hi-res textures) and the final (crz #2743) posted today is listed as version 2003 (non hi-res textures), is that correct?
TIA
Burke Lake Par 3 texture resolution question
Re: Burke Lake Par 3 texture resolution question
I can only go by the information supplied by the designer when he or she fills in the upload form. 

Re: Burke Lake Par 3 texture resolution question
That's why I posed my question to the designer - Doug Hurst. It seems a little odd that the final would take a step backward regarding textures from the beta.
And thank you, Andy, for keeping this site running!!
And thank you, Andy, for keeping this site running!!

Re: Burke Lake Par 3 texture resolution question
I will copy this link to lspn.net. Doug is more likely to see it there.
No matter where you go, there you are.
Re: Burke Lake Par 3 texture resolution question
I'm pretty sure the BETA did not use Hi-Res. That was my mistake when submitting it. 2743 should be playable by all 2003.gator wrote: ↑November 6th, 2022, 9:01 pm Quick database related question for Doug Hurst regarding his Burke Lake Par 3 courses:
the beta (crz #2227) from 2015 is listed as version 2003T (hi-res textures) and the final (crz #2743) posted today is listed as version 2003 (non hi-res textures), is that correct?
TIA
Re: Burke Lake Par 3 texture resolution question
ThanxGoesForIt wrote: ↑November 7th, 2022, 3:40 pmI'm pretty sure the BETA did not use Hi-Res. That was my mistake when submitting it. 2743 should be playable by all 2003.gator wrote: ↑November 6th, 2022, 9:01 pm Quick database related question for Doug Hurst regarding his Burke Lake Par 3 courses:
the beta (crz #2227) from 2015 is listed as version 2003T (hi-res textures) and the final (crz #2743) posted today is listed as version 2003 (non hi-res textures), is that correct?
TIA