pmgolf wrote: ↑May 17th, 2021, 3:19 am
Still Linksing wrote: ↑May 17th, 2021, 1:37 am
pmgolf wrote: ↑May 16th, 2021, 1:22 pm
You prefer fictional courses, ..... That's fine.
I prefer courses that work well in Links.
I don't care if real or fictional. I have just found after grading them fictional are dominant.
Interesting looking at your list. There are only 4 courses that don't appear in my top 100.
You have included many MS remakes. MS remakes were excluded from being rated in my list and apart from those, there are only 4 courses not on my list.
It's all about the golfing experience for me. I really love a well crafted course, and especially one where strategy and excellent shot-making are required rather than just brute strength. Whether or not it is a MS remake has nothing to do with it. When I finish playing a course and feel like I have really had to dig deep to hit the needed shots, and have also experienced a testing strain against my aging nerves - that's when I decide how good the course was. Professional golf course architects seem to always have the knack for creating the kind of challenge that I love!
Pete
Looking back to understand the topic being discussed and seeing where MS remake was a qualifying part of this discussion, I see this by Still Linksing, "Microsoft remakes.
I play Links LS 2000 and prefer to play these courses only in Links LS 2000." This leaves out these real courses that have had credible re-designs playable in Links LS 2003 in my opinion beyond what were once MS courses put out before Links LS 2000---Bay Hill, Banff Springs, Cog Hill, Congressional, Firestone, Harbour Town, Innisbrook, Kapalua Plantation, Oakland Hills, Oakmont, Pebble Beach, Pinehurst #8, Prarie Dunes, Riviera, The Belfry, Torrey Pines-South, Valderrama, and Valhalla. Pinehurst #2 is a totally different course since redesign, so would not fit in. Somehow Royal Melbourne an original MS course inadvertantly was included in top 100 original list even though wrote was dismissing them being on list since played MS courses only in Links LS 2000? Taking out Still Linksing's proclivity for playing these courses in Links LS 2000 and adding them in would mean more real courses to play for those Links players that do not have the Links LS 2000 version. Occasionally I still turn that game on to play it as well as Links LS 1999. Over the years since 1990 I have had most all Links games with exceptions of Links LS 1998, Links LS 2001, Links 2004 as did not have xbox and Links Extreme version that somehow then did not spark my interest to buy it.